259. The Fateful Year of 1923: Preliminary Remarks by the Editor
Hella Wiesberger |
---|
Marie Steiner describes the circumstances at the time in the preface to the private reproduction “Study Material from the Meetings of the Thirty Circle”, published by her in 1947, as follows: “Due to Michael Bauer's serious illness and the resignation of Marie Steiner-von Sivers,1 Since 1921 the executive council of the Anthroposophical Society was represented by Dr. Carl Unger, Emil Leinhas and Ernst Uehli, who lived in Stuttgart. |
But the most important parts were saved: Rudolf Steiner's answer to the question at hand: What are the tasks of the Anthroposophical Society? Here we experience the guidelines Rudolf Steiner gave for the leadership of a society, his methodology, which is always based on respect for the freedom of others, on non-interference in the individual core of the soul, but on unyielding strictness in all questions concerning the truth, so that self-deception cannot gain ground and become systematic. |
During these weeks, he also gave four lectures to the Stuttgart branch on the developmental phases of the Anthroposophical Society, the necessity of its reorganization and the conditions for forming an Anthroposophical community. |
259. The Fateful Year of 1923: Preliminary Remarks by the Editor
Hella Wiesberger |
---|
On the Negotiations for the Reorganization of German Corporate Relations The first general meeting to be held since the outbreak of the First World War in the summer of 1914 took place in Stuttgart on September 4, 1921. A new executive council was formed (Dr. Carl Unger, Emil Leinhas, Ernst Uehli) and the Society's headquarters officially transferred from Berlin to Stuttgart. Shortly thereafter a group was formed that was named the “Thirty Circle” after its membership and was intended to be a link between the executive council and the membership (for the participants in the Thirty Circle, see S. 832). When they wanted to negotiate with Rudolf Steiner about the question of the consolidation of the Society after the fire at the Goetheanum, Ernst Uehli, a member of the central council and a teacher at the Waldorf School, set up a smaller committee for this purpose, the so-called “Circle of Seven”. At the first meeting with Rudolf Steiner, this circle consisted of Ernst Uehli and six other teachers from the Waldorf School: Caroline von Heydebrandt, Eugen Kolisko, Maria Röschl, Karl Schubert, Erich Schwebsch and Walter Johannes Stein. Marie Steiner describes the circumstances at the time in the preface to the private reproduction “Study Material from the Meetings of the Thirty Circle”, published by her in 1947, as follows: “Due to Michael Bauer's serious illness and the resignation of Marie Steiner-von Sivers,1 Since 1921 the executive council of the Anthroposophical Society was represented by Dr. Carl Unger, Emil Leinhas and Ernst Uehli, who lived in Stuttgart. Germany was a seething cauldron. The endless difficulties associated with the various machinations of political and social groups and the ever-increasing inflation undermined all efforts at reform. The collapse of economic life threatened to suffocate spiritual life. The grinding nature of this struggle was reflected in the souls and paralyzed the energies. This bleak picture was constantly being presented to those who were striving in the anthroposophical way. Anti-Semitism had already begun to dig deep into the souls. As an outward sign of the declaration of war by Pan-German circles, one could already see a painted swastika on many doors. Assaults and murders in the various political camps were the order of the day; they were systematically used; the assassination of Walther Rathenau is just one example. Rudolf Steiner's public lectures were also abruptly terminated by such activities at the moment of their most effective development. The rush to attend the lectures had been enormous, and so the enemies deployed the strongest counterforce on all fronts to destroy this effect. Dr. Steiner was horrified to see how some of the energies of even the formerly enthusiastic anthroposophists weakened in the face of this turmoil, and how the driving forces in the souls of inexperienced young people gained ground and overthrew. He saw the danger of disintegration through individual efforts, the neglect of the nourishing and cohesive mother soil of anthroposophy. He urgently warned the leading members in Stuttgart. In December 1922, he had given a commission to Mr. Uehli, who had traveled to Dornach on company business, in 1916 at Rudolf Steiner's instigation. See the biographical documentation Marie Steiner-von Sivers, A Life for Anthroposophy, Dornach 1988 and 1989.2 He considered it to be of crucial importance: he was to discuss it with his colleagues on the board in Germany, so that the joint response to it would be given to him on his next arrival in Stuttgart. There, a “Thirty Circle” had formed, which wanted to take a stand on the problems of the time and society in serious deliberations. In between, there were still smaller circles that were even more urgently concerned with the problems close to their hearts and wished to bring them to Rudolf Steiner in more intimate sessions. The disputes of the “Thirty Circle”, which we now want to announce, concern such sessions. An attempt has been made to transcribe in shorthand what was said by Rudolf Steiner himself. It was not possible to record the many questions and opinions that the members expressed in rapid succession. But the most important parts were saved: Rudolf Steiner's answer to the question at hand: What are the tasks of the Anthroposophical Society? Here we experience the guidelines Rudolf Steiner gave for the leadership of a society, his methodology, which is always based on respect for the freedom of others, on non-interference in the individual core of the soul, but on unyielding strictness in all questions concerning the truth, so that self-deception cannot gain ground and become systematic. He relentlessly tackled the complacency that could easily arise on this ground in order to avoid difficulties, and personal attitudes. And so these messages reflect Rudolf Steiner's method in matters of social leadership, which is so necessary for us today. While the “Thirty Circle” in Stuttgart was dealing with the catastrophic situation that had arisen there and the feared disintegration of society, the Goetheanum in Dornach burnt down on New Year's Eve 1922. In Stuttgart, too, the meetings of the “Thirty Circle” were marked by the tragedy of the devastating event; they tried to become aware of their own inadequacies, which karmically could have made such an event possible. Was it to be sought in the fact that the enthusiasm of the early years had been paralyzed by the difficulties that had arisen, both external and internal, so that the spiritual connection with each other and with the anthroposophical branches had been lost? — The 'institutions' existed as the endeavors of individual differentiated groups; but within this social union, the human connecting spiritual bond was missing. Rudolf Steiner was again approached with a request for advice and help, but he in turn expected a moral response to the task he had set the Stuttgart board in early December. He was always willing to help, so he decided to travel there and divide his time between Dornach and Stuttgart in the following weeks. In Stuttgart, in addition to the meetings of the Siebenerausschuß, there were endless discussions in the Dreißigerkreis, lasting well into the night. For these discussions, Rudolf Steiner and Marie Steiner traveled from Dornach to Stuttgart every week from mid-January to the end of February. During these weeks, he also gave four lectures to the Stuttgart branch on the developmental phases of the Anthroposophical Society, the necessity of its reorganization and the conditions for forming an Anthroposophical community. See the volume “Anthroposophische Gemeinschaftsbildung” (Forming an Anthroposophical Community), GA 257. Necessary remarks on the quality and reproduction of the protocols of the Stuttgart negotiationsThe following discussions between Rudolf Steiner and the Stuttgart leadership committees “Siebenerkreis” and “Dreißigerkreis” are not based on a literal stenographic transcript by a professional stenographer, but on stenographic notes that are sometimes detailed and sometimes more or less incomplete. We have Dr. Karl Schubert, a teacher at the first Waldorf School in Stuttgart, to thank for the transcripts. However, it was only many years later that he undertook the task of transcribing them into plain text with the help of Dr. Erich Gabert. In his preliminary remarks, dated “Stuttgart, April 10, 1935,” Gabert writes: "Because the shorthand was partly difficult to read after such a long time, the text sometimes remains uncertain. When it was not possible to guess and complete the meaning with certainty, the words have been left unchanged, even if they appear incomprehensible at first. At the time, it was not always noted who said the written words. Therefore, the separation of the speakers sometimes had to be described as questionable; unfortunately, it cannot be said with certainty whether Dr. Steiner really said all the words that are under his name or whether they are the words of a participant in the conversation. There are no transcripts of all the meetings that took place in the Thirties Circle. The available ones are all reproduced here. What the other participants said at the meetings has only been included to the extent that it was deemed necessary for an understanding of Dr. Steiner's words. Dr. Steiner's words themselves are given as completely as they appeared in the shorthand." In order to evaluate the abridgements made by Schubert-Gabert to the contributions of the other participants, a comparison was made with the original stenographic notes of Karl Schubert available in the archives of the Rudolf Steiner estate administration. The comparison showed that by summarizing and partially omitting these votes, the transferred volume of the protocols in relation to the total volume of the stenographic notes was reduced by about 3/4 to 2/3, in some cases to less than half. This must be taken into account if one wants to get a picture of the duration of the meetings and of Rudolf Steiner's real contribution to the discussions. In this regard, however, it is even more significant that the original stenographic notes also show a very different degree of incompleteness. They range from almost complete protocols to only a few notes in the form of keywords. However, to make a complete transcription of the original stenographic notes today would require years of extremely laborious work and the result would probably still be very unsatisfactory. The essential parts for the Rudolf Steiner Complete Works are, after all, primarily Rudolf Steiner's remarks. The dots that frequently appear in the reproduction published by Marie Steiner in 1947 (...) do not mark omissions she made, as might be mistakenly assumed, but rather her need to make it visually perceptible that the protocols are incomplete in numerous places. However, since no dots appear in Karl Schubert's plain text transcriptions, and these generally indicate omissions, they have been omitted from the present edition. This is mainly to avoid the misunderstanding that any omissions have been made. Some textual corrections in comparison with Marie Steiner's edition of 1947 are based on a new comparison with Karl Schubert's manuscripts; furthermore, on brief notes by Dr. Karl Heyer, who was also a participant in the meetings of the “Thirty Circle”. Insertions in square brackets [] are by the editor. H.W.
|
37. Writings on the History of the Anthroposophical Movement and Society 1902–1925: The School of Spiritual Science II
27 Jan 1924, Rudolf Steiner |
---|
The central focus will be the General Anthroposophical Section, which will initially incorporate the Pedagogical Section. I myself will be responsible for leading this section. |
She has been appointed to lead this section by the General Anthroposophical Society itself. The visual arts were influenced by the construction of the Goetheanum. |
I will be speaking about “beautiful sciences” at the “Goetheanum” soon. We in the Anthroposophical Society are fortunate to have a wonderful representative of the “beautiful sciences” among us: Albert Steffen. |
37. Writings on the History of the Anthroposophical Movement and Society 1902–1925: The School of Spiritual Science II
27 Jan 1924, Rudolf Steiner |
---|
We cannot establish branches of the Goetheanum wherever souls long for anthroposophy. We are a poor society. We will only be able to enable those individuals who are far away from the Goetheanum to participate in its work by continuing in written correspondence what happens at the Goetheanum itself. We shall have to discuss how to organize this written correspondence. It will enable those who are unable to spend a certain length of time at the Goetheanum to participate in the classes there. In addition, this correspondence will be facilitated by the visits that the leaders of life at the Goetheanum, or those closely associated with them in various places, will make wherever possible. But if the School of Spiritual Science is to flourish with its esoteric life, all this must be held together by the genuine anthroposophical spirit. The leadership at the Goetheanum must strive not to isolate itself in any way from the spiritual life of the present day, but to look out with full participation for everything that is revealed in this spiritual life for the true further development of humanity. Therefore, the management will be organized in such a way that individual personalities will take over the administration of individual sections, which are already possible and which will hopefully flourish in ever more active work. The central focus will be the General Anthroposophical Section, which will initially incorporate the Pedagogical Section. I myself will be responsible for leading this section. A Medical Section will ensure that anthroposophy can fertilize the art of healing. Dr. Ita Wegman will be in charge of this section. From the very beginning, medicine has been closely connected with the central task of human knowledge. Anthroposophy will prove its vitality by restoring this connection. Dr. Ita Wegman's clinical-therapeutic institute is a model for this endeavor and its practical application. Anthroposophy must be particularly concerned with artistic life. For a number of years, we have seen a burgeoning artistic life in the cultivation of eurythmy, declamation and recitation. Music is closely connected with this. This life will be cultivated in a separate section. Marie Steiner has devoted herself to this work with the greatest commitment. She has been appointed to lead this section by the General Anthroposophical Society itself. The visual arts were influenced by the construction of the Goetheanum. The central works that have been developed on this basis have given rise to a style that will undoubtedly still have many opponents by its very nature. Naturally, it can only express itself imperfectly at the moment. But it will be better understood when people become more familiar with anthroposophy in general. Miss E. Maryon helped me in the development of this style in a way that befits the leader of the sculpture section. There used to be a concept of “beautiful sciences”. They bridged the gap between actual science and works of human creative imagination. The view that a more recent period has developed of “science” has pushed the “beautiful sciences” completely into the background. I will be speaking about “beautiful sciences” at the “Goetheanum” soon. We in the Anthroposophical Society are fortunate to have a wonderful representative of the “beautiful sciences” among us: Albert Steffen. He is called upon not only to lead the Section for “beautiful sciences”, but also to revive this branch of human creativity, which has been pushed aside to the detriment of civilization. Furthermore, the personalities working among us allow us to form a section for mathematical and astronomical views, headed by Dr. L. Vreede, and a natural science section, headed by Dr. Günther Wachsmuth. The astronomical field is particularly important for anthroposophy, and the natural science section is intended to show how genuine knowledge of nature is not in contradiction to, but in full harmony with, anthroposophy. With the book he is about to publish, Dr. G. Wachsmuth has proven himself to be the right leader of this section. (To be continued in the next issue.) |
The Gospel of St. John: Preface
Samuel LockwoodLoni Lockwood |
---|
As a comment on the publication of the spoken lectures that were first published privately at the urgent request of members of the Anthroposophical Society and are now being made available to the public in book form, we cite the following excerpt from Rudolf Steiner's The Story of My Life. “There are two categories of works that are the fruit of my anthroposophical activities: first, my published books, available to the world at large, and second, a great number of lecture courses first intended to be printed privately and for sale to members of the Anthroposophical Society only. |
The manner in which the privately printed works unfold is something in which the soul configuration of the whole Society collaborated, in the sense set forth.” |
The Gospel of St. John: Preface
Samuel LockwoodLoni Lockwood |
---|
As a comment on the publication of the spoken lectures that were first published privately at the urgent request of members of the Anthroposophical Society and are now being made available to the public in book form, we cite the following excerpt from Rudolf Steiner's The Story of My Life. “There are two categories of works that are the fruit of my anthroposophical activities: first, my published books, available to the world at large, and second, a great number of lecture courses first intended to be printed privately and for sale to members of the Anthroposophical Society only. These were taken down with varying accuracy in shorthand, but lack of time always prevented me from correcting them. I should have preferred to have the spoken word remain such; but the members clamored for the private printing of the lectures, and so this came about. If I had had time to correct them the restriction ‘for members only' would have been unnecessary from the start. Now, for over a year, it has been abandoned. “Here in The Story of My Life it is necessary to make clear the relative position of these two categories—the published books and the private printings—in what I have developed as anthroposophy. “Whoever would follow my inner struggles and labors to bring anthroposophy to present-day consciousness must do so by means of my published writings intended for the world at large. There I have dealt with all we have today in the way of striving for knowledge; and there is also set forth what took ever clearer shape in me through spiritual vision, what became the edifice of anthroposophy, albeit in many respects imperfectly. “But side by side with this call to build up anthroposophy and, in doing so, to serve only what resulted from the duty to impart communications from the spirit world to the general educated public of today, there arose the obligation to meet the spiritual needs of the soul, the spiritual longings, of our members. “There was above all an urgent demand to have the Gospels and the substance of the Bible in general presented in the light that had become the anthroposophical light. People wanted lecture courses on these revelations that have been vouchsafed mankind. “These privately given courses led to something else. Only members were present, and these were familiar with the elementary disclosures of anthroposophy. One could talk to them as to advanced students, and these private lectures were given in a way that would not have done for writings intended for the public. In this inner circle I could talk of things in a way different from what it would necessarily have been, had the presentation been intended for the public. “There exists, then, something in this duality—the public and the private writings—that really springs from two sources: the wholly public writings are the result of what struggled and worked in me alone, whereas in the private printings the Society struggles and works with me. I listen to the vibrations in the soul life of the members, and the character of the lectures is determined by my living vividly in what I hear there. “If for no other reason than that I worked from the reality of the members' soul needs, the privately printed lectures must be judged by a different standard than those given full publicity from the start. The contents of the former were intended as oral communications, not as books; and the subjects discussed were gleaned in the course of time by listening for the soul needs of the members. “ The substance of the published books conforms with the demands of anthroposophy as such. The manner in which the privately printed works unfold is something in which the soul configuration of the whole Society collaborated, in the sense set forth.” |
332b. Current Social and Economic Issues: Open letter from Rudolf Steiner Regarding his Resignation as Chairman of the Supervisory Board of “The Coming Day”
Rudolf Steiner |
---|
To the members of the Anthroposophical and the Free Anthroposophical Society in Germany: May 1923 My dear friends! The development and reception of anthroposophical endeavors in the present makes it necessary for me to change the way I work. |
This requires that I meet the increased demands for the cultivation of the anthroposophical need more than has been the case since the time when practical institutions of various kinds were formed by the objectives of the friends of our cause. |
I therefore hope that my resignation from the supervisory board of the “Day to Come” will be seen as an expression of my trust in its leadership and that it will become such among the members of the Anthroposophical Societies as well. It should strengthen that trust, not weaken it. If there were any reason to weaken it, I would have to stay. |
332b. Current Social and Economic Issues: Open letter from Rudolf Steiner Regarding his Resignation as Chairman of the Supervisory Board of “The Coming Day”
Rudolf Steiner |
---|
To the members of the Anthroposophical and the Free Anthroposophical Society in Germany: May 1923 My dear friends! The development and reception of anthroposophical endeavors in the present makes it necessary for me to change the way I work. Anthroposophy has revealed itself as a soul need for an ever-increasing number of people; on the other hand, it is increasingly confronted with misunderstandings and misjudgments by many. This requires that I meet the increased demands for the cultivation of the anthroposophical need more than has been the case since the time when practical institutions of various kinds were formed by the objectives of the friends of our cause. These institutions have arisen in a thoroughly justified way from the intentions of these friends on the basis of the anthroposophical movement. And it was also understandable that when these friends strove for the realization of such practical ideas, the wish arose for me to be involved in the administration of the corresponding institutions. I accommodated this wish, although I was aware that this accommodation, which was a natural obligation, would draw me away from my actual task of caring for the center of anthroposophical work for some time. For a relatively short period of time, I had to comply with the wishes of my friends. But now I must also take the position that I may continue to work only within this center of anthroposophical life with its artistic and educational implications. I must belong entirely to anthroposophy as such, as well as to its artistic and educational endeavors and the like, and to institutions such as “Kommender Tag” etc. only to the extent that the spiritual impulses of anthroposophy flow into them. In the interest of the anthroposophical cause, I must withdraw from all administrative matters of these institutions. Only in this way will it be possible for me to work as intensively as is necessary in view of their own demands and the rapidly growing opposition. These are the reasons that move me to resign from the office of chairman of the supervisory board of “Kommenden Tages” now. I ask the friends of the anthroposophical cause not to take this as a sign that the intensive, appropriate and ideal work of “Kommenden Tages” will change. This work is in good hands; and I ask that no degree of trust be withdrawn from it in the future. I am convinced that everything will go better if I now formally place this work in the hands of those who will do it well, and devote myself to the cause to which I have been assigned by fate. Whatever intellectual stimulus I can give to the Clinical-Therapeutic Institute, the Coming-Day Publishing House, the research institutes, the journals, etc., will flow better to them if I am removed from the actual administration. Practically speaking, nothing essential will change within the same, since I have been obliged, even in recent times, to grow into the situation described as necessary for the future through the circumstances I have explained. So it is only the situation that has actually arisen that is being officially established. I therefore hope that my resignation from the supervisory board of the “Day to Come” will be seen as an expression of my trust in its leadership and that it will become such among the members of the Anthroposophical Societies as well. It should strengthen that trust, not weaken it. If there were any reason to weaken it, I would have to stay. However, the situation is such that I am unnecessarily dependent on the knowledgeable and prudent leadership, and therefore obliged, to return to the anthroposophical cause in the narrower sense. I ask you to take this as the reason for the step that is now necessary. Rudolf Steiner |
217a. The Task of Today's Youth: Announcement of a Youth Section
24 Feb 1924, Rudolf Steiner |
---|
The Executive Council of the Anthroposophical Society at the Goetheanum is seeking to establish not only the sections already mentioned but also a further section. |
We would like to not lose science in world view reverie, but to gain it in the awakening of spiritual experience. The leadership of the Anthroposophical Society asks young people if they want to understand it too. If they find this understanding, then the “Section for the Spiritual Strivings of Youth” can become something vital. |
217a. The Task of Today's Youth: Announcement of a Youth Section
24 Feb 1924, Rudolf Steiner |
---|
The Executive Council of the Anthroposophical Society at the Goetheanum is seeking to establish not only the sections already mentioned but also a further section. This will be possible if the intentions of the Executive Council meet with a corresponding response. In every age, young people have been somewhat at odds with old. This gypsy truth is a consolation to many when it comes to the behavior of today's youth. But this consolation could easily become a disaster. One should understand the present youth from the “spirit of the present” both in their questionable aberrations and in their all too justified striving for something different from what the old give them. First of all, there is the youth that is pushed into the academic career by the circumstances of life. They are offered “science”. Solid, secure, fruitful science for the outer life. It would be nonsense, in the manner of many laymen, to rant about this science. But the soul of youth still freezes to this science before it comes to recognize its solidity, its security, its fertility for the outer life. Science owes its greatness to the strong opposition it has faced since the mid-19th century. At that time, people realized how easily man can sail into the uncertainty of knowledge when he rises from the lowlands of research to the heights of a world view. It was believed that chilling examples of such a rise had been experienced. And so they wanted to free “science” from the world view. It should stick to the “facts” in the valleys of nature and avoid the high roads of the mind. When they opposed the worldview, they derived a certain satisfaction from the act of opposing. The worldview fighters of the mid-19th century were happy in their fighting mood. Today's youth can no longer share this happiness. They can no longer stir up satisfying feelings in their souls by experiencing the fight against the “uncertainty” and “crush” of the worldview. For today there is simply nothing left to fight against. It is impossible to advocate freeing “science” from “worldview.” For the worldview is dead by now. In contrast, however, the feelings of young people have made a discovery. Not at all a discovery of the intellect, but one that comes from the whole, undivided human nature. The young have discovered that without a worldview, it is impossible to live a dignified human life. Many of the old have heard the “evidence” against the worldview. They have submitted to the power of the evidence. The youth no longer pays any intellectual attention to this power of evidence; but it instinctively senses the powerlessness of all intellectual proof where the human heart speaks from an invincible urge. Science presents itself to young people in a dignified way; but it owes its dignity to the lack of a world view. Young people long for a world view. But science needs young people. At the Goetheanum, we would like to understand young people in such a way that we can seek the paths to a worldview with them. And we hope that in the light of the worldview, a true love for science will be generated. We would like to not lose science in world view reverie, but to gain it in the awakening of spiritual experience. The leadership of the Anthroposophical Society asks young people if they want to understand it too. If they find this understanding, then the “Section for the Spiritual Strivings of Youth” can become something vital. |
259. The Fateful Year of 1923: Introduction to Man in the Past, Present and Future, Lecture I
14 Sep 1923, Stuttgart Rudolf Steiner |
---|
2 I would not want to fail to express the hope here that after the extraordinarily auspicious beginning, the further conference will proceed in a quite fruitful way for the development of the German Anthroposophical Society. It is indeed necessary that much of what our Stuttgart friends have hoped for be fulfilled at this conference. |
You see, these are things that arise from anthroposophical work. And we in our Society must not pass by such things indifferently, but it is part of the attainment of a comprehensive consciousness for a society to know what is actually going on within its own horizon, within its own body. |
Kolisko, and which can now be purchased, something has come into the world again that should actually be pointed out today. So we can already say that within the anthroposophical community today, something is happening that is worthy of being brought to the general consciousness of the Anthroposophical Society. |
259. The Fateful Year of 1923: Introduction to Man in the Past, Present and Future, Lecture I
14 Sep 1923, Stuttgart Rudolf Steiner |
---|
See GA 228 Allow me to begin today's lecture with a few words of introduction. I would like to express my warmest thanks for the wonderful welcome that Dr. Steiner and I received at the beginning of this conference. It was only natural that we should have come to this conference, knowing that those who organized it, our friends in Stuttgart, had great hopes for this gathering of anthroposophical friends and continue to do so. The conference began auspiciously; we were introduced to the development of the anthroposophical movement in a heart-winning way, and this afternoon, many important things that have emerged from the anthroposophical movement were pointed out. However, some of the things that have been mentioned in the history of the anthroposophical movement will have to be corrected here and there; not so much in the discussion of what happened earlier, but in the characterization of what – at least it had to be understood that way or at the beginning of the anthroposophical movement – is said not to have existed. Some of the comments made in this regard will indeed have to be corrected later.1 And it would then be desirable for the minutes, if such a document is produced from this meeting in these expensive times, to be edited with particular care. 2 I would not want to fail to express the hope here that after the extraordinarily auspicious beginning, the further conference will proceed in a quite fruitful way for the development of the German Anthroposophical Society. It is indeed necessary that much of what our Stuttgart friends have hoped for be fulfilled at this conference. And so, in this brief introduction, let me express the wish that, when the actual discussion of the substantive content of this conference begins tomorrow, this discussion may prove to be quite favorable for the further course of the anthroposophical cause in Germany.I cannot help but take this opportunity, because opportunities for such things do not always arise and every one should be seized when it presents itself. I cannot help but take this opportunity, in these introductory words, to point out something that is directly related to the inner content of the anthroposophical movement in a broader sense, especially at this time. Many things have been mentioned that the anthroposophical movement has achieved. And precisely in view of the situation in which we find ourselves, where there are so few opportunities to attract attention to what comes out of the womb of this anthroposophical movement, it should not be neglected that, in these days, the anthroposophical movement also has something very important to point out with regard to the research that is being done within it. If our work were as well received in the world as that in the field of external science, we could again point out how research results of the very highest order have emerged from the bosom of the anthroposophical movement. It is well known how the medical dispute between homoeopaths and allopaths has been waged over a long period of time, how all manner of arguments have been put forward against the use of the smallest entities of substances, and how, to this day, no one has been able to produce exact, authoritative experiments that show beyond doubt that entities, when suitably diluted, enter into a metamorphosis of activity that is now something quite different from their material-substantial mode of action. Now, at our Biological Research Institute, we have succeeded, thanks to the dedicated work of Mrs. Kolisko, in scientifically determining the results of the effectiveness of the smallest entities in a flawless manner up to 1 in a trillion. You see, these are things that arise from anthroposophical work. And we in our Society must not pass by such things indifferently, but it is part of the attainment of a comprehensive consciousness for a society to know what is actually going on within its own horizon, within its own body. For one cannot really imagine that anyone can have a true awareness of his overall state of health if, for example, he is unaware of the processes of nutrition that are taking place within him – I do not mean in a scientific sense, but in the sense that one feels hunger and thirst. Therefore, I wanted to take this opportunity to point out that in the writing that emerged from the Biological Research Institute, written by Mrs. Kolisko, and which can now be purchased, something has come into the world again that should actually be pointed out today. So we can already say that within the anthroposophical community today, something is happening that is worthy of being brought to the general consciousness of the Anthroposophical Society. Because of this, a strengthening and invigoration of this consciousness will certainly be able to emerge. I don't know if I have anticipated anything that someone who wanted to talk about the matter wanted to say; but I did want to take the opportunity of this introduction and also to express my warmest greetings to the biological part of our anthroposophical research on this day, when I am speaking for the first time during these days.
|
270. Esoteric Instructions: First Lesson in Prague
03 Apr 1924, Prague Translated by John Riedel Rudolf Steiner |
---|
My dear Friends! The Anthroposophical Society having been founded in a new form during the recent Christmas Conference in Dornach, the teachings given in various groups of the former Anthroposophical Society are now intended to flow into what has since become the actual School of Spiritual Science. The school is intended to become a kind of center for the whole of the anthroposophical movement which is at work within the Anthroposophical Society. This School of Spiritual Science, due to the interrelationships of its most essential working groups, will certainly have its central point at the Goetheanum in Dornach, and efforts will be made naturally to seek and find ever-better formats not only within the Goetheanum, but also in extension for the friends of the anthroposophical movement all over the world who only occasionally can show up in person in Dornach. |
When a person becomes a member of the Anthroposophical Society, that person rightly expects to become acquainted with and to experience Anthroposophy. |
270. Esoteric Instructions: First Lesson in Prague
03 Apr 1924, Prague Translated by John Riedel Rudolf Steiner |
---|
My dear Friends! The Anthroposophical Society having been founded in a new form during the recent Christmas Conference in Dornach, the teachings given in various groups of the former Anthroposophical Society are now intended to flow into what has since become the actual School of Spiritual Science. The school is intended to become a kind of center for the whole of the anthroposophical movement which is at work within the Anthroposophical Society. This School of Spiritual Science, due to the interrelationships of its most essential working groups, will certainly have its central point at the Goetheanum in Dornach, and efforts will be made naturally to seek and find ever-better formats not only within the Goetheanum, but also in extension for the friends of the anthroposophical movement all over the world who only occasionally can show up in person in Dornach. What I have to say to you during this lesson, as well as in the next esoteric lesson, must be considered to have been spoken to you, my dear friends, within the School of Spiritual Science. I want to begin, however, by mentioning a few matters concerning the constitution of the school. Those who decide to become members of this School, after having been members of the Anthroposophical Society for two years, enter into an obliga¬tion, in the spiritual sense. When issuing a membership card for the School of Spiritual Science, the leadership of the school will always endeavor to ascertain whether the person in question is capable of taking on a spiritual obligation of this kind. When a person becomes a member of the Anthroposophical Society, that person rightly expects to become acquainted with and to experience Anthroposophy. In a certain way they will get to know Anthroposophy. This is the very thing that has been made possible by the Christmas Foundation Conference at Dornach, for there is to be complete openness in this matter, and no particular obligations whatever will devolve upon members of the Anthroposophical Society. Whoever enters the School of Spiritual Science as a member, however, must from then on keep in mind that the central aspect of this School of Spiritual Science is to be the source of anthroposophical life now and for some time in the future. Anthroposophical life is founded certainly on what for all times has been known as secret inner knowing or secret science. But the word secret was never intended to describe all kinds of goings on in secret circles that must not be made known to the world. Specifically, it was meant to describe what belongs not to the external surrounding world, not to what is outside the human body, but rather this use of the word secret has really always been used to explain that the content expressed in esoteric schools has its source and origin in the deeply hidden inner being of man himself. Therefore, in contradistinction, it has been called secret instead of public. Secret certainly has the meaning of the actuality of inner knowing, and it is counted as secret since it is the actuality of inner knowing in one’s profound depths, in a person’s secret inner being, which comes to the fore as revelation. What basically comes from one’s deepest inner nature loses its proper significance, its proper appreciation, indeed its proper proprietary nature, when it is profaned, when it is in some fashion bandied about in public. What always happens on the broad stage of public disclosure, you can be sure, is that these things will not be taken up with the necessary sincerity, with the necessary dignity. It is, indeed, the first requirement laid upon those who approach esoteric schooling that they bring to it the deepest, the very deepest seriousness. This is how the School of Spiritual Science must be taken up, and this is why it requires its members to be truly genuine representatives of the anthroposophical world movement in every situation of their lives. This is the case to such an extent that the leadership of the school is obliged to exclude a member if in its opinion that member is not a representative in the right way. This is not intended to be a tyrannical regulation, my dear friends. It is merely a regulation that arises out of the principle that freedom must be met with freedom. If the leadership of the school is to administer it in the proper manner it must be allowed to stipulate with whom it wishes to conduct the affairs and carry the content of the school. That is why it is necessary to emphasize the seriousness with which those approaching the school must truly grasp Anthroposophy as a world movement. The school has been divided into Sections in order to meet the needs of those coming towards it, under the present circumstances of civilization, with the intention of carrying on their spiritual life within it. The teaching that I shall give during this session and the next should be seen as coming within the scope of the General Anthroposophical Section which, as well as the Education Section, I myself shall lead. The School of Spiritual Science will then also have a section for the spoken arts with music and eurythmy which will be led by Frau Dr. Steiner, a section for medicine under the leadership of Frau Dr. Ita Wegman, and a section for the sculptural arts under the leadership of Miss Maryon. Further there will be a section for something to which scarcely any attention is paid these days, to the detriment of our whole civilization, and that is the section for the fine arts under the leadership of Herr Albert Steffen. There will also be a section for astronomy and everything connected with it under the leadership of Fraulein Dr. Vreede, and also a section for the natural sciences under the leadership of Dr. Wachsmuth. Something else has also been established recently in response to a need, something about which little can be said as yet because it has been plunged into ferment, a fermenting element which the school intends to ensure will link itself in all honesty with the intentions of the Goetheanum. This is the section for promoting the spiritual life of young people, the section for the universal striving of today's youth, which is a part of the historical process. When observed objectively, it is perfectly clear that something new is coming into being here, although at present young people can only talk very unclearly about what it is they actually mean. To bring into clear consciousness what is for the moment still only expressed in all kinds of indeterminate feelings and the sense of something lacking, to gain a clear view of all this will be the aim of the section that I may call the section for the wisdom of youth. In this way the School of Spiritual Science seeks to bring esoteric life to each individual as something that is an extension of today's external culture. It is something for which the world has the profoundest longing, without actually realizing that what it is seeking is the very thing that is to live in the esoteric life of our School of Spiritual Science. We have absolutely no intention of imitating ordinary universities in any way by doing what they do in a somewhat different form. This was attempted during the period when various opinions, over which I exercised no influence, were given a free rein. It has been tried in Dornach, but from the beginning I regarded it as not being quite the correct way to go about things. Nevertheless, there is an obligation in this realm not to hinder whatever might want to break through into the light of day. But now that there has been a trial run, and people have realized that the goal cannot be reached along this route, there is no longer any need for our school in Dornach to give the impression that it wants to compete with what goes on at ordinary universities. Now our school can aim to give to humanity the very thing that ordinary education is unable to achieve; it can now become some¬thing for which human beings cannot help having the most profound longing. This is how the School of Spiritual Science in Dornach intends to be the real esoteric center for what ought to live in the anthroposophical movement. When I say that this school must be regarded with utmost seriousness, I immediately have to add that this very statement itself can never be taken seriously enough. So I want it to lead the way as we set out with our considerations. Those who regard the esoteric life flowing through this school merely as something that flows alongside their own life cannot be its members in the right and proper sense. Only those can be proper members of this school who are filled with truth in such a way that their life becomes intimately bound up with this spiritual life so that their whole life cannot but become intimately bound up with the esoteric teaching that flows to them from this school. My dear friends, your assessment of this school will not be correct if you regard it as a product of arbitrary human intention. This school has been instituted by the spiritual world. It came into being through listening to what the spiritual powers who guide the world consider to be the right thing for human beings in our time. So rather than regarding our school as a human institution, let us see in it an institution that has arisen totally out of the will of those spiritual beings who are close to the earth and who work for the welfare of mankind. If you accept it as the earthly image of a spiritual institution you will be looking at it in the right way. Your feeling for it will be right if you take every word that is spoken within this school as being spoken by someone who is responsible to none but the spiritual powers who guide the anthroposophical movement. This school is an understanding between those spiritual powers whose authority is appropriate for the phase of evolution mankind has reached today and those human beings who seek to become members of the school. It could be said, my dear friends, that you come face to face with the spiritual world when you become a member of this school. The more profoundly and intensely you grasp this, the more you will carry in you what the school must be, which is alone what gives it its true meaning. Those who know that the spirit itself speaks through this school will surely achieve the seriousness necessary for following with deep earnestness all that is carried on within the school. What today we can only do in Dornach within this school will gradually be sent by suitable means to all those who have become members of the school, but meanwhile, we cannot take the fifth step after the third, but only after the fourth. As time goes on, step-by-step, intimate contact will be established between all the members, wherever they may be, and what flows through the school in Dornach. As a beginning, my dear friends, let us turn to the very first thing that comes to meet someone who seriously sets out on the path to real inner awareness. Real inner awareness, my dear friends! We must be quite clear about the fact that the external world with which we are faced contains within it the task we have to fulfill during our physical life on earth between birth and death. We would be misunderstanding ourselves and also the gods entirely if we were to believe that we ought to bear contempt towards what comes to meet us as a task during our journey on earth between birth and death. Human beings must enter fully into the activity and work of the physical world. But what do they find there? They find beauty, magnitude, and majesty in all the wonderful formations of the mineral kingdom that also form the grounds we need in order to be capable of fulfilling our tasks on earth. They find majesty in the plant kingdom; they find what they need in the animal kingdom; and they find what is closest to them in the kingdom of physical human beings. They find all the things in the kingdoms of nature raised to a higher plane when they lift up their eyes to the clouds, to the blue sky or out to the stars, to the sun and the moon. Not to recognize beauty, magnitude, and majesty in all these things would cause human beings to stray from their true path in life. To enter into the esoteric does not mean a repudiation of the beauty, greatness, and majesty of all that presents itself to us in life. But however far we enter into the mineral kingdom with all its wonderfully formed crystal shapes, however far we enter into the plant kingdom with all its sparkling colors from which the sunlight shines towards us out of nature, however far we go in contemplating the enchantment conjured up out of the depths of nature in the lively kingdom of the animals, and however much we marvel at the way the secrets of the world all meet in the physical human shape and form, nevertheless, all that we experience in the depths of our inner being we do not find in these realms of form and color, nor do we find it in these kingdoms of the world in all their sparkling, bubbling life. In the end the human being stands in this world and says, “I sense the magnitude, the beauty, and the majesty of all the forms taking shape and the colors unfolding out there, but whatever it is that I myself am must have its origin in another world.” When the human being feels the beauty, magnitude, and majesty of the physical-sensory world and feels that he cannot find there the best of what he himself is, then he will be drawn more and more toward that place, where specifically all esoteric insight must come from. He will be drawn toward that abyss, only on the other side of which lies what a person can have of his ancient stand, his ancient source, his ancient wellspring.1 He will be drawn to that abyss, where he certainly must gaze on the boundary between the sensory world and the spiritual world; he will be drawn to that abyss, to what is meant for him as a bridge for crossing over into a wholly other world, to the exit point, to the threshold of inner awareness, and only to where the spiritual world lies. Moreover, specifically what I have to impart to you my dear friends, are the communications of the gestalt that in the esoteric has always been identified as the Guardian of the Threshold. There stands this exalted gestalt, a being, you will learn, from whom entry is obtained, a being that certainly is not less real than a physical person upon the earth, but who far surpasses the reality of the physical human being on earth. But whoever initially merely in grappling with and feeling into the esoteric, with human nature unencumbered by prejudice, allows the communications to come forth, such a person must then feel how this Guardian of the Threshold stands there, exhorting, admonishing concerning what the seeker after actual inner awareness should experience, when he really does step into the actuality of inner awareness. Why does the Guardian of the Threshold stand there? He stands there because true awareness can only be achieved when we approach rightfully and well-prepared, with a fully internalized open-minded demeanor and a true striving for the actuality of inner awareness. There is nothing theoretical about truly striving for actually awareness. A true striving for actually knowing is only achieved if the soul raises itself above everything offered by the sense-perceptible world. Those who approach this actuality of knowing too soon, unprepared and without the proper demeanor, will not achieve it in the right manner. They will harm both themselves and the world. A true striving for actual knowing is present to a high degree in those who seek a real path into the spiritual world, such as that which will gradually be opened up by the three classes of the School of Spiritual Science. This is also the case, though more on the level of the soul, for those who merely want to receive information about the spiritual world. There must be at least a glimmer of what the initiate experiences on meeting the Guardian of the Threshold. It is about this experience that we will now speak. Those who receive these impartations and allow them to work on their souls with fitting earnestness will find, by again and again going over and practicing what they hear, by inwardly experiencing what they hear, the path that in reality leads them across this threshold and into the spiritual world. So now, my dear friends, let us bring before our souls what it is that the voice of the earnest Guardian of the Threshold makes us aware of, if we would jump over from the semblance of knowledge on this side of the world to the true inner knowing on the other side. There he stands with his admonishing gaze. There he speaks about the world of the senses’ beauty and grandeur and sublimity. There he also speaks about the person not being able to find in this beautiful, this grand, this majestic world what he recognizes as his fullest worth, his unique individuality. There this Guardian of the Threshold draws our attention across over the abyss looming to the left and to the right of the Threshold, there he draws our attention across into another realm, into the realm of spirit. There however deepest darkness rules initially. The person must acquire the notion that what there bestirs itself in him only as deepest darkness through the impressions of the sensory world, that there lies the ancient wellspring, the ancient source, and the ancient stance of his own intrinsic essence. The Guardian of the Threshold says something like this, translated from the spirit language he speaks, when a person approaches his earnest countenance:
My dear friends, after the Guardian of the Threshold has drawn the seeker's attention to the tremendous contrast that exists between what our eyes can see in the realm of the senses before we encounter the Guardian, and what we can surmise from the dark recesses that lie on the other side of the threshold, in which the source and origin of our own being can be sought, he then allows the seeker to glimpse what awaits him when he makes himself capable of living within the light that must first brighten up and clarify itself out of the darknesses from that side of the abyss. Then a second word resounds from the Guardian of the Threshold, which I will write down and bring with me next time. This second word now indicates what the seeker must expect when he has crossed the threshold and formed within his own inner being, now lit up, an organ with which he can leave the darkness and approach what the Guardian of the Threshold says at this moment:
The Guardian draws attention to the wide expanse of existence-awareness where being is experienced in light, and to another expanse of existence-awareness, where in time's onward march, the powers of creation hold sway from epoch to epoch. Then attention is drawn to the depths of the intrinsically human heart-sensitivity, where the whole world is revealed as though in a mirror. By drawing attention to these three worlds, the world of space, the world of time, and the world of the heart's depths, there can resound from the world shaping powers the eternal admonishing word of existence-awareness, “O man, know yourself!”2 After this the person must be shown his inner nature. But the inner nature of a person is not only within the person’s inner nature; the human inner nature in all the world. What we carry in our inner nature directly comes forth and takes shape in the external world ether. Oh, the most secret thoughts, most secrete feelings and desires and stirrings of will, they come forth at the same time in the world ether and take on fully-formed shapes, so that in the external world we see in the shapes, in fully-formed creatures, just what we most certainly are. Also added to the observation of what we really are, there resounds then the voice of the Guardian of the Threshold, making clear to us in this manner who we are. Why is the abyss really there, this abyss that stretches between the sensory world and the spirit world? The abyss is there that out of it rise those forces of our inner nature that will not allow us to cross over the threshold. Such forces are there in our inner nature. They would stop us, hold us back, not allow us to come to true inner awareness across the Threshold. Such forces are there in our thinking; such forces are there in our feeling; such forces are there in our willing. When we merely have an inkling of them, they are formless.3 When we observe them, behold them, these hindering and hemming-in powers in our thinking, feeling, and willing that register themselves in the world-ether, then they appear as malformed animals. And certainly, nobody knows himself who cannot observe them in this significant form as malformed animals, which the person out of his own inner nature draws out and sees as hinderances, impediments for transitioning across the Threshold. The moment eventually must come in life, in which the person places before his eyes the images that live as hindering powers in his thinking, feeling, and willing. We must not allow ourselves to give in to any illusions about this. In ordinary consciousness one is not normally aware of what a person is, and one does not take seriously what a person is. In picture-form, in truthful-form the Guardian of the Threshold brings this to the person’s awareness. These are the words with which he clarifies how the forms are, how they come to be engraved in the etheric through the counter-striving forms in our willing, feeling, and thinking. A person must someday shudder before these forms that he inscribes in the world ether, and then he will begin to feel just what he has to overcome in order to penetrate to true inner awareness. The Guardian of the Threshold speaks, clarifying the nature of the beasts that rise up as forms in human thinking, feeling, and willing:
Only when a person in a shudder has beheld the images of the counter-striving powers in thinking, only then by beholding these negatives within, only then will a person acquire the strength to enter the true field of inner awareness. If a person does not have the will to observe in himself in the images of the three beasts, living there as the fear of knowing, as hatred of knowing, and as doubts about knowing, such a person will not come to inwardly knowing himself. He will not come to inwardly knowing the world, whoever hesitates there, shuddering in this manner to gaze upon himself. So come into being by impressing once again the threefold beasts placed before you, before your souls, my brothers and sisters, as the Guardian speaks in clarification:
How the person gets these wings, how the person finds the strength to subdue these three, will be the content of the next lesson, on Saturday at five o'clock. When these words in such a descriptive-solemn way have been presented to the person concerning his awareness of himself, when they have rung forth, then once again will attention be drawn, as in a perspective, to what stands there expectantly, in order to fulfill the word, “O Man, know yourself!” The first part, however, can only be completed by observing the beast’s three forms, which is the additional content of the next lesson. Then, once again, the Guardian of the Threshold calls out:
|
259. The Fateful Year of 1923: Letter Regarding Resignation
31 May 1923, Dornach Rudolf Steiner |
---|
Also sent as a circular letter. To the members of the Anthroposophical and the Free Anthroposophical Societies in Germany. My dear friends! The development and reception of anthroposophical endeavors in the present makes a change in my working method necessary. |
This requires that I meet the increased demands for the cultivation of the anthroposophical need more than has been possible since the time when practical institutions of various kinds were formed by the objectives of the friends of our cause. |
I therefore hope that my resignation from the supervisory board of the “Kommenden Tages” will be seen as an expression of my trust in its leadership and that it will become such among the members of the Anthroposophical Societies as well. It should strengthen, not weaken, trust. If there were any reason to weaken it, I would have to stay. |
259. The Fateful Year of 1923: Letter Regarding Resignation
31 May 1923, Dornach Rudolf Steiner |
---|
published in the German weekly journal “Anthroposophie”, No. 48 of May 31, and in the Swiss weekly journal “Das Goetheanum” of June 17, 1923. Also sent as a circular letter. To the members of the Anthroposophical and the Free Anthroposophical Societies in Germany. My dear friends! The development and reception of anthroposophical endeavors in the present makes a change in my working method necessary. On the one hand, anthroposophy has emerged as a soul need for an ever-increasing number of people; on the other hand, it is increasingly confronted with misunderstandings and incorrect assessments by many. This requires that I meet the increased demands for the cultivation of the anthroposophical need more than has been possible since the time when practical institutions of various kinds were formed by the objectives of the friends of our cause. These institutions have arisen in a thoroughly justified way from the intentions of these friends on the basis of the anthroposophical movement. And it was also understandable that when these friends strove to realize such practical ideas, they wished to see me personally involved in the administration of the corresponding institutions. I accommodated this wish, although I was aware that this accommodation, which was a natural obligation, would draw me away from my actual task of caring for the center of anthroposophical work for some time. For a relatively short period of time, I had to comply with the wishes of my friends. But now I must also take the position that I may continue to work only within this center of anthroposophical life with its artistic and educational implications. I must belong entirely to anthroposophy as such, as well as to its artistic and educational endeavors and the like, and to institutions such as “Kommender Tag” etc. only to the extent that the spiritual impulses of anthroposophy flow into them. In the interest of the anthroposophical cause, I must withdraw from all administrative matters of these institutions. Only in this way will it be possible for me to work as intensively as is necessary in view of their own demands and the rapidly growing opposition. These are the reasons that move me to resign from the office of chairman of the supervisory board of “Kommenden Tages” now. I ask the friends of the anthroposophical cause not to take this as a sign that the intensive, appropriate and ideal work of “Kommenden Tages” will change. This work is in good hands; and I ask that no degree of trust be withdrawn from it in the future. I am convinced that everything will go better if I now formally place this work in the hands of those who will do it well, and devote myself to the cause to which I have been assigned by fate. Whatever intellectual stimulus I can give to the Clinical-Therapeutic Institute, the KommendenTag publishing house, the research institutes, the journals, etc., will flow better to them if I am removed from the actual administration. Practically speaking, nothing essential will change within the organization, since I have been obliged, even in recent times, to grow into the situation described as necessary for the future as a result of the circumstances I have explained. So it is only the situation that has actually arisen that will be officially established. I therefore hope that my resignation from the supervisory board of the “Kommenden Tages” will be seen as an expression of my trust in its leadership and that it will become such among the members of the Anthroposophical Societies as well. It should strengthen, not weaken, trust. If there were any reason to weaken it, I would have to stay. But the fact is that I am unnecessary to the knowledgeable, prudent leadership and therefore obliged to return to the anthroposophical cause in the narrower sense. I ask you to take this as the reason for the step that is now necessary. |
270. Esoteric Lessons for the First Class I: Second Hour
22 Feb 1924, Dornach Translated by Frank Thomas Smith Rudolf Steiner |
---|
The Christmas Conference [1923] was to be the beginning of true esotericism pouring into the entire anthroposophical worldview stream, supported by the Anthroposophical Society. How often - one can ask - have I forgotten what I found to be quite beautiful during the Christmas Conference and in my thoughts and feelings continued as though the Anthroposophical Society were the same as it was before the Christmas Conference. And if someone says: that is not the case with me, it could be quite important for that person to ask himself: Am I fooling myself to think it is not the case with me? In respect to all anthroposophical activity have I realized that a new phase of the Anthroposophical Society has begun? To ask this question is very significant, for then the correct earnestness enters the soul. And you see, this is connected to the life-blood of the Anthroposophical Society and therefore to the life-blood of every member who has requested acceptance in the Class; and it is good if it relates to something which exerts a strong influence in life. |
270. Esoteric Lessons for the First Class I: Second Hour
22 Feb 1924, Dornach Translated by Frank Thomas Smith Rudolf Steiner |
---|
My dear friends, We will relate what is said today to the previous lesson, partly to preserve the thread, and partly because there are members present who were not here last time. We shall therefore start with a short recapitulation of the last lesson. We proceeded in thought to the place where the human being - who with normal consciousness can grasp the sense-world, which is the world that surrounds him - can feel himself related to the super-sensible, related to a being which corresponds to his own being. And we want to first develop this sensation before proceeding to the mysteries of the spiritual life, which we will do shortly. The first sensation should make us aware of how the human being, in his normal condition, lives surrounded by the world of the senses, which however he is not able to identify with his own being. We shall therefore develop this theme. And although the words “Know thyself!” have been enunciated throughout the ages, encouraging man to perform his noblest deeds, still he can find no answers, no satisfaction if, under the influence of “Know thyself”, he only sees what the senses provide - the exterior world. Now, however, he is directed towards something else, something beyond the exterior world. If with this sensation, which one can have when one gazes out to the depths of cosmic space with the question of his own being in mind, when in thought we approach super-sensible being, which is one with the inner human being, then the corresponding sensation will be given through the words I provided to you the last time:
We can now observe and feel in our souls the beauty, the greatness and the sublimity of the external world, but we also realize that we can never find our own being in this world. For the person who seeks the spirit, it is necessary to repeatedly feel this sensation in his soul. Because by deeply experiencing the sensation that by looking out into the external world we gain no answer to the question of who we are, feeling this sensation again and again gives the soul the impulse and the strength that can carry us into the spiritual world. Yet just as by having this sensation we will be carried up into the spiritual world, we must also bear in mind that the person of normal consciousness in normal life is unprepared to encounter that world, which in reality is the world of his own being. Therefore on the border between the sense-world and the spiritual world that guardian stands who earnestly warns people against crossing over into the spiritual world unprepared. And it is the case, my dear friends, that we must always keep in mind the fact that the Guardian stands before the [entrance to] the spiritual world for the well-being of unprepared human beings. And we must therefore be quite clear about the necessity for a certain attitude of soul in order to achieve real knowledge and insight. If such insight were provided to everyone walking down the street it would be terrible for them because they wouldn't be prepared. They would be receiving it without the preparatory attitude of soul. Therefore we must deeply feel the second sensation which over and over again tells us how we must approach the Guardian:
Then the Guardian himself speaks while we are still on this side, in the sense-fields. He points to the other side where for us is unmitigated darkness while we are on this side, but which is to become light-filled, which must become light to us through spirit-knowledge, from out of which he speaks who alone is bright. He speaks, indicating the apparent darkness, this maya-darkness:
Whoever can feel deeply enough the words which resound from the Guardian's mouth, if he looks back upon himself, will realize that this looking back, the perception in looking back, constitutes the first stage of self-knowledge. Self-knowledge which is preparatory for the true self-knowledge which reveals spiritual cosmic knowledge of the being which is one with our own humanity. And then the knowledge arises which one can obtain on this side of the threshold of spiritual existence, knowledge which reveals the contamination in our own thinking, feeling and willing in terrible but true images; as three beasts arising from the yawning abyss between the sense-world and the spirit-world. What we should feel at the abyss of being between the maya, the illusion, and the real world, should appear before our souls as the fourth sensation.
We must be quite clear, my dear friends, that bravery in acquiring knowledge is not present at first in the soul, but cowardice for acquiring knowledge is what dominates. Especially in our time that cowardice is what holds back most people from even approaching an insight into the spiritual world.
That is the second thing that we have within us - which plants doubt in our soul, every kind of uncertainty about the spiritual world. It is inherent in feeling, because feeling is weak and cannot rise to enthusiasm. True knowledge must outgrow superficial enthusiasm which trails all kinds of cheap external life. Inner enthusiasm, inner fire which becomes a burning thirst for knowledge; that is what overcomes the second beast.
We must find the courage and the fire to bring activity to our thinking. When we create with ordinary consciousness we create arbitrarily, we create what is not real. When, however, we correctly prepare ourselves for creative thinking, the spiritual world streams into our creative thinking. And then, due to knowledge-bravery, to a burning thirst for knowledge and to creative knowledge, we are truly standing in the spiritual world.
Such sensations can lead to feeling what we must activate in ourselves in order to enter the spiritual world as genuine, living human beings. In ordinary life it is often the most banal things which cause us to realize that life is serious and not a mere game. But what leads to knowledge does not impress us as much as exterior life does. It is all too easily made a game. And one is convinced that the game is in earnest. But one harms one's self and others greatly by playing at spiritual striving, by not being completely earnest about it. This earnestness should not be expressed as sentimentality. Humor may be called for with respect to some aspects of life. But the humor must then be serious. When we compare earnestness with mere game-playing, it is not sentimentality, false piety or the rolling of eyes as opposed to games. Rather is it the possibility of really concentrating on spiritual striving and consistently and wholeheartedly living in it. In order to sense the importance of what I am saying, my dear friends, it would be really good for spiritual striving if all the friends who are sitting here - especially those who have been in the Anthroposophical Society for a long time - to ask themselves the following question: How often have I resolved to undertake some task related to anthroposophical life, and how often have I completely forgotten about it after a short time? Perhaps I would have done it if I had thought about it, but I did not think about it any more. It was extinguished, just as a dream is extinguished. It is neither meaningless nor unimportant to ask yourselves such a question. And perhaps it would not be unimportant if a large number of our friends were to undertake something in this direction now. The Christmas Conference [1923] was to be the beginning of true esotericism pouring into the entire anthroposophical worldview stream, supported by the Anthroposophical Society. How often - one can ask - have I forgotten what I found to be quite beautiful during the Christmas Conference and in my thoughts and feelings continued as though the Anthroposophical Society were the same as it was before the Christmas Conference. And if someone says: that is not the case with me, it could be quite important for that person to ask himself: Am I fooling myself to think it is not the case with me? In respect to all anthroposophical activity have I realized that a new phase of the Anthroposophical Society has begun? To ask this question is very significant, for then the correct earnestness enters the soul. And you see, this is connected to the life-blood of the Anthroposophical Society and therefore to the life-blood of every member who has requested acceptance in the Class; and it is good if it relates to something which exerts a strong influence in life. Therefore it would be good if all those who wish to belong to the Class ask themselves: Isn't there something I can do - now that the Anthroposophical Society has been re-founded - do differently than previously. Couldn't I introduce something new into my life as an anthroposophist? Couldn't I change the way I acted previously by introducing something new? That would be enormously important, if taken seriously, for every individual who belongs to the Class. For thereby it would be possible for the Class to continue without being burdened by such heavy baggage. For everyone who keeps to the old humdrum routine burdens the progress of the Class. It is perhaps not noticeable, but true nevertheless. In esoteric life there is no possibility of introducing what is so prevalent in life: interpreting lies as truth. If one tries to do this in esoteric life it is not the interpretation which matters, but the truth. In esoteric life only the truth works, nothing else. You may color something because of vanity, but what has been colored makes no impression on the spiritual world. The unvarnished truth is what is effective in the spiritual world. From all this you can judge how different spiritual realities are - which under the surface of life work today as always - from what everyday life shows, patched up as it is with so many lies. Very little of what passes today between people is true. To continually remind ourselves of this belongs to the beginning of work within the Class. For only with this notion can we find the strength to cooperate here in the Class with what will be unfolded in our souls from lesson to lesson in order that we may find the path to the spiritual world. For we will only be able to recognize what must be cultivated in our thinking, feeling and willing in order for the three beasts to be defeated: thinking, the thought - phantom; feeling - mockery; willing - the bony crookedness of spirit. For these three beasts are the enemies of knowledge. We see them in the mirror, but as realities from the yawning abyss of being. And deeply rooted with our humanity is everything which hinders us from real knowledge, firstly in our thinking. Normal human thinking is reflected in the thought-phantom of the first beast, the form of which was described thus:
It is the image of ordinary human thinking which thinks about things of the outside world and doesn't realize that such thinking is a corpse. Where did the being live whose corpse this ordinary thinking is? Yes, my dear friends, nowadays - in accordance with contemporary civilization - when thinking from waking in the morning till retiring at night according to the guidance given us in school and in life itself, our thinking is a corpse. It is dead. When did it live, and where? It lived before we were born; it lived when our souls were in pre-earthly existence. Just as you imagine, dear friends, that the human being lives on the physical earth animated by his soul within and he goes around in this physical body until his death, when the animating soul is invisible to external observation and the corpse is visible - the dead form of the human figure. You must imagine this related to thinking. A living, organic, growing, moving being possessed it before the human being entered into earthly existence. Then it becomes a corpse buried in our own heads, in our brains. And just as if a corpse in the tomb were to declare: I am the man! so declares our thinking when it lies buried in the brain as a corpse and thinks about the external things of the world. It is a corpse. It is perhaps depressing to realize that it is a corpse, but it is true, and esoteric knowledge must hold to the truth. That is the meaning of the Guardian of the Threshold's words. After he has described the warning of the three beasts, he continues. And the words which resound in our hearts are these:
I will repeat it:
Thinking, with which we achieve so much here in the sense-world, for the gods of the cosmos is the corpse of our soul's being. By entering into an earthly existence we have died in thinking during this time on earth. The death of thinking had gradually been preparing itself since the year 333 A.D. The middle of the fourth post-Atlantean period. Before that life had poured into thinking, which was the heritage of pre-earthly existence. The Greeks felt that vitality, as did the Orientals, in that they thought of thinking as being the work of the spirit, of the gods. They knew, in that they thought, that in every thought the god lived. That has been lost. Thinking has become dead. And we must heed the message of the times that reaches us through the Guardian:
This cosmic age began in the year 333 after Christianity began, after the first third of the fourth century had passed. And now thinking, devoid of the force of life, is clearly present in everything. And the dead thinking of the nineteenth century forced dead materialism to the surface of human civilization. It is different with feeling. The greatest enemy of humanity, Ahriman, has not yet been able to kill feeling in the same way he killed thinking. Feeling also lives in human beings in the present cosmic age. But man has to a great extent driven this feeling down from full consciousness into the halfway unconscious. Feeling arises in the soul. Who has it in his power, as he has thinking in his power? To whom is it clear what lives in feeling as it is clear to him what lives in thinking? Take one of the saddest - to the spirit saddest - occurrences of our times, my dear friends. When people think clearly they are citizens of the world, for they well know that thinking makes you human, even when it is dead in the present age. But people are separated by their feeling into nations, and especially today they let this unconscious feeling dominate in the worst possible way. Because people feel themselves as only belonging to a certain group, all kinds of conflicts arise. Nevertheless, world karma places us in a certain human group, and it is our feeling that acts as an instrument of world karma when we are placed in this tribe, in that class, in that nation. It is not through thinking that we are so placed. Thinking, if it is not colored by feeling and willing, is the same thinking everywhere. Feeling, however, is graduated according to the different regions of the world. Feeling lies halfway in the unconscious, alive yes, but in the unconscious. Therefore the ahrimanic spirit, unable to exert influence on the living part, uses the opportunity to agitate in the unconscious. And he concentrates this agitation on the confusion between truth and error. All our prejudices based on feeling are colored by ahrimanic influences and impulses. If we want to enter the spiritual world this feeling must rise up before our souls. We must be able to include feeling in the development of knowledge. Through constant review of our own being, we must be able to know what kind of persons we are as feeling human beings. This is not easy. With thinking it is relatively easy to achieve clarity about ourselves. We don't always do it, but it is still easier to admit: you are not exactly a genius, or you lack clear thinking about this or that. At the most, it is either vanity or opportunism which prevents us from achieving clarity about our thinking. But with feeling we never really get to the point of observing ourselves in our souls. We are always convinced that the direction of our feeling is the correct one. We must delve most intimately into our souls if we wish to know ourselves as feeling human beings. Only by facing ourselves directly with complete conscientiousness do we lift ourselves up, do we lift ourselves up over the obstacles which the second beast places before us on the path to the spiritual world. Otherwise, if we do not occasionally practice this self-knowledge as feeling human beings, then we will always develop a mocking countenance with respect to the spiritual world. Because we are not conscious of our ailing feeling capacity, we are also unconscious of being mockers of the spiritual world. We disguise the mockery in all possible forms, but we are still mocking the spiritual world. And it is just those, of whom I spoke previously, who lack earnestness, who are the scoffers. They are sometimes embarrassed to express the mockery even to themselves, but they are still mocking the spiritual world. For how can one lack seriousness regarding the spiritual world, playing games about it, without mocking it. To such as they the Guardian speaks:
The first beast is the reflection of our will. The will does not only dream, it does not lie only half in the unconscious; it lies completely in the unconscious. I have often described to you, my dear friends, how the will lies deep in the unconscious. And deep in the unconscious is where man seeks the paths of his karma, at least for ordinary consciousness. Every step that a person takes in life related to karma is measured. But he knows nothing about it. It is all unconscious. Previous earth-lives work forcefully into his karma. Karma leads us to our life's crises, to our decisions, to our doubts. Here we meet the individual's aberrations, the person who lives only for himself, and seeks only his own way. In thinking: one seeks the path which all men seek. In feeling: one seeks the path which his group seeks. In feeling we recognize if someone is from the north, from the west or the south, from eastern, southern or central Europe. One must concentrate on the will's unconscious impulses in order to see another human being as a single individual, rather than merely a human being in general or a member of a group. This is an act of will - but also deep in the unconscious. The first beast shows the aberrations of the will. The Guardian reminds us:
In our willing work the spiritual powers which want to strip our bodies from us during our earthly existence and therewith take a portion of our souls with it, in order to build an earth which does not continue to develop as Jupiter, Venus, Vulcan. Rather the earth is to be sundered from divine intentions and stolen at some point in the future. Together with the earth stolen from the gods, the human being would be united with certain powers which work in his will ... the same will through which he seeks his karma. The first beast is surely capable of revealing in a mirror-image what is working in the will: bony head, dried-out body with dull blue skin, the crooked back. It is the Ahrimanic spirit, which acts in the will when karma is being sought and which can only be overcome by the courage of knowledge. So the Guardian of the Threshold speaks about this beast as I have just described. I will read it again:
In these words from the Guardian of the Threshold's mouth resound further the warning to the human being seeking knowledge and insight. Let the following words live most intensively in our souls, my dear friends, and let us listen often to the Guardian's words:
Once again, you must grasp the concordance in these verses: (The first stanza of this mantram is written on the blackboard)
At first we feel what each stanza contains. The second stanza refers to feeling: (The second stanza is written on the blackboard)
Now we feel first: “denies”, and then “hollows out” and feel the nuance that enters into the verses by “denies” becoming “hollows out”. The Guardian's words directed to willing:
This third stanza is written on the blackboard:
Note that in all three stanzas the word “evil” echoes. [The word is underlined.] And if you observe and feel the critical points in the escalations and in the difference between thinking, feeling and willing [the words are underlined], and if you correctly sense how all three are united by the always recurring word “evil”, then, my dear friends, each stanza will become a mantram for you, according to its inner meaning. And they can become a guide on the three stages to the spiritual world - that of the third beast, of the second beast and of the first beast. And if you never omit these three concordances and never fail to unite the three by the one decisive word towards an inner soul- then they will become your guide, my dear friends, on the path past the Guardian of the Threshold and into the spiritual world. We will get to know him better in the following lessons.
|
262. Correspondence with Marie Steiner 1901–1925: 183b. Letter to Rudolf Steiner (for Tatiana Kisseleff) (formerly 172)
10 Dec 1923, Dornach Marie Steiner |
---|
Albert Steffen (1884-1963), Swiss poet, joined the Theosophical Society in August 1910 in Munich and moved to Dornach in 1920. When the weekly journal Das Goetheanum was founded in 1921, he became its editor. From May 1922 he was General Secretary of the Anthroposophical Society in Switzerland. At Christmas 1923, he became the second leader of the General Anthroposophical Society and head of the Section for the Literary Arts and Sciences of the School of Spiritual Science. From Christmas 1925, he was the first leader of the Society.89. Isabella de Jaager (1892-1979), a member from February 1914 in Paris, one of the first eurythmists in Dornach, later working as a eurythmy therapist. |
262. Correspondence with Marie Steiner 1901–1925: 183b. Letter to Rudolf Steiner (for Tatiana Kisseleff) (formerly 172)
10 Dec 1923, Dornach Marie Steiner |
---|
183bTo Rudolf Steiner (for Tatiana Kisseleff) I am very sorry that I will not be able to organize the Christmas performances as I would have done if I had been in Dornach throughout December. But since there is so much material, I hope that something decent will come of it. I am counting on “Olaf Åsteson” 81 (Kiss.[Kisseleff]) and “The Disciple” — most of the newly acquired material and some repetitions. “Die Sonne schaue“ 82 This time I ask Savitch 83 and her Solovjoff; 85 - “Epiphany” by Heredia 85 and the other French sonnet (desert) 86 could also be repeated; the Christmas sayings... Could we have a new Steffen? “The Holy Supper“, 87 from 'Wegzehrung'. Page 101. Savitch should have the central figure there; Kisseleff perhaps the angel, the three animals: De Jaager,89 Baravalle,90 Spiller; the scorpion — Simons. It would be great to have another strong Steffen. Did Savitch get a new sound-eurythmy number? She asked for it so much. Hopefully everything will work out after all; it could also be that I leave here on Saturday. Please give this sheet to Mrs. Kisseleff with warm greetings and appropriate preparations. Hollenbach 91 She will no doubt have some Christmas performance to present. Since we are not moving yet, one could say Bogo 92, that I am Miss 93 I would like to let her stay at the Brodbeck house with the others. Warmest regards, Marie
|