The Rudolf Steiner Archive

Berlin, August 9, 1904

Dear Miss Scholl!

I am sending you the following, which you need right now. ¹ To be continued as soon as possible. Regarding Mr. Künstler's enquiry in a letter to follow shortly.²

Sincerely

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

• 1. From Mathilde Scholl's reply dated August 10, 1904, it can be seen that the enclosure was a meditation instruction and the continuation of the exegesis of “Light on the Path” that he had promised her in his letter dated December 28, 1903. See appendix, page 445.
• 2. Eugen Künstler's enquiry related to Annie Besant's lecture tour planned for September. Rudolf Steiner replied to him on August 16, 1904. This letter is intended for GA No. 263.

Berlin, August 11, 1904

Dearest Mrs. and Dr. Paulus!

You, dear Doctor, have sent me a beautiful, poetic expression of your mood. It is very precious to me. It is so full of the mystical powers arising in the depths of your being that I can only find it confirmed what I have seen in you from the beginning of our acquaintance: you have great powers, dear lady, and you are capable of much. And in the not too distant future, your inner abundance will reveal itself to you in a surprising way, for the benefit of humanity. You are so kind as to call me “leader” in your letter. I can and may lead only as far as the exalted Master, who guides me, gives me the guidance. I follow him with full consciousness in everything I say to others. And if you recognize that, then please follow me in one thing, rather follow him: in patience. The right mood is patience. I do not say this because I want to express that you, dear woman, would not have this patience, but because we must keep reminding ourselves of this mood of patience.

You say in an earlier letter that you cannot express what moves you. I can only give you the assurance that the ability to express yourself that is entirely appropriate for you will come. But again: patience. The mood of waiting quickens our steps.

You think that when you repeat words in meditation that are actually self-evident, it is futile. But that is not the case. If it depended on knowledge, then it would be futile. But it depends on experiencing again and again through oneself what one should be and what one should make of oneself independently. You can find more about this in the addenda that I promised you for “Voice of Silence” and am enclosing today.

You see, dear madam, inner strength is not gained by hating compulsion. Rather, it is gained by voluntarily, but completely voluntarily, imposing a compulsion on ourselves. Please do not understand such formulaic templates as I gave you in Stuttgart as anything other than advice, and only as advice. But it is advice based on the experience of occultists over many long periods of time.

Therefore, I would like to ask you, dearest Mrs. Doctor, and also you, dear Mr. Doctor, to continue in meditation as you have begun. The formula given should still be short for a long time, but should be repeated briefly every morning. I think you might dwell on this formula for too long. That is not necessary. But consider that the adepts, too, let this formula run through their souls every morning, even if it is at lightning speed, as a constant self-admonition that life must never be concluded, but that every self must give birth to a higher self.

The entire meditation work would therefore continue to exist for both of you:

1. In the evening, before resting, review the day.

2. In the morning:

1. Let the soul go through the formula for the higher self.¹
2. Meditation on “Light on the Path”.² A new sentence from 8 to 8 days. But patiently stay with one for 8 days. (More about this in the attachment).
3. Devotional mood towards that which we revere as the highest, the divine.

Please limit the time as you deem fit, if you still want to do a special meditation described by you. But what I have indicated is effective and fruitful and leads up the path of knowledge. Whether we perceive what we know as self-evident or not, nothing depends on that, but that it goes through our soul.

You can trust your feelings about what you know about me. I also know that you have an active imagination. But an active imagination as such is not necessarily misleading. It can be, but it can also be the bringer of opportunities for the influx of higher experiences. And you see, dear Madam, how your experiences correspond with mine in certain respects. I have written to you about this in advance in my letter from London. I will write you more soon. And as for me, I know that fantasy is as far from me as possible; I also keep myself quite far away from all fantasy with all my strength. Dear Mrs. and Dr., believe me, what I say arises in my experience with the strictness that the mathematician imposes on himself. And in my present life, before I ventured into theosophy, I did everything to ensure that no kind of fantasy could seduce me. For many years my life was trained for this.

You describe young Gräser correctly. To be as he is is certainly not without danger. And people of his kind are symptomatic of the present time. I recommended him to you because I know how you are different from others.

What you write about Deinhard and Bresch is certainly true. But let us be lenient. Both gentlemen cannot be any different than their karma requires.³. Let us stick together, let us throw ourselves into what we see as the right thing and let us overlook the weaknesses of others.

I am very, very pleased that Mrs. Besant is coming to Stuttgart in September.

For the time being, I send my warmest regards to you both,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

Franz Paulus replied to this letter from Rudolf Steiner on November 30, 1904:

First and foremost, I would like to inform you of my decision to become a student at the E.S.T. on the basis of the “Rules” you gave us ; therefore, pending further instructions from you, I will start tomorrow to make a daily note of how I feel about observing rules 1, 2, and 3 with satisfaction.⁴

• 1. “Brighter than the sun...”, see page 447.
• 2. Obviously this is a typographical error; from the context, also with the other letters to Doris and Franz Paulus, it must be “Voice of Silence”.
• 3. Regarding Deinhard and Bresch, see the letters to Marie Steiner-von Sivers dated April 18 and 19, 1903 in Briefwechsel und Dokumente... (Correspondence and Documents...), GA 262
• 4. Doris Paulus, on the other hand, only joined the E.S.T. a little later.

Berlin, August 12, 1904

My dear Mr. von Henning!

Please excuse the delayed response.¹ I am only now beginning to emerge from the workload. And in future you certainly shouldn't have to wait so long. I was glad to know that you were in the bath and I hope that your rest has progressed quite well. It is not good to start practical meditation work during a period of rest. Neither for your health nor for meditation. I can only advise you, if you want to practice meditation, to start it during your normal professional activity. Because meditation should not take up any time. That is even a basic condition if it is to be fruitful. I will now tell you “in confidence” (that is, just for you) what meditation consists of. In the evening, before falling asleep, - very briefly, three to four minutes - review what you have done and experienced during the day. The important thing is to let the most important events of the day pass before you. You ask yourself: Did I follow this event with an observing gaze in such a way that I can learn from it for my future life; and how should I have done it in order to achieve this purpose? Or with regard to an action that you have done: Did I do it in such a way that I can still approve of it now that I am no longer in the middle of it, but am observing myself as if I were someone else? All this should be done in such a way that you learn from yourself, that you turn life into a lesson. In this way you really do gradually achieve elevation to the “higher self”, which goes beyond the lower self. And - believe the occult experience - it not only contributes to the expansion of human abilities, but also to recovery in every respect.

Then in the morning: Right after getting up. Before you have taken any nourishment, you use a few minutes – later it takes longer – for the actual meditation. If a quarter of an hour is possible, then it is better. It consists of an elevation to the “higher self”, for which there is a very specific formula that you say to yourself in your mind. I will share this formula with you “in confidence” right away if you write to me that you want to use it. Then, secondly, there is a concentration consisting in emptying the consciousness of everything that the life of everyday life brings us. For a few minutes, everything that otherwise occupies us must disappear from our consciousness, including the memory of the business and obligations of everyday life. Then we let a sentence from an inspired writing enter into this empty consciousness and give ourselves completely to its impression. We do not speculate about the sentence, we live with it as we live with a beloved child. And we keep this same sentence for weeks. Because only then does it give us its strength. Only then, after weeks, do we replace it with another sentence. For example, meditators go through “Light on the Path” sentence by sentence, which gives their meditation long content. “Light on the Path,” “The Voice of Silence,” “Bhagavad Gita” are among the best meditation books.

The last part of meditation is then to create a devotional mood within oneself towards that which is the highest, the divine. In this context, it is not a question of this or that conception of the divine, but rather of that which - according to our subjectivity - is truly intimate to us. For the Christian, it may be Christ, for the Hindu, the “Master”, for the Muslim, “Muhammad”; indeed, a modern scientist may become absorbed in the “divine nature”. What matters is the devotional feeling, not the idea one has of the “divine”.

If you, my dear Mr. von Henning, want to progress in the development of mystical powers, I can give you even more ways to do so. I can tell you in advance that there is certainly no danger involved in any respect. And in connection with your question, and knowing you as I do, I can tell you that there is a “closed circle” into which I may admit you if you wish. Otherwise, there is no obligation for the beginning except that towards yourself, which I have already expressed to you in this letter. The only other condition is complete abstinence from alcohol. But this must be, because otherwise all occult work under ordinary circumstances is in vain. If you are looking for meditation, then I will send you the “Rules” and you can decide. But if you want to practice meditation without such a connection, I will also be at your side with advice; only the connection to the “narrower esoteric circle” also offers the occult connection, which in itself already brings help and soul progress.

I would like to answer your card, which I find so welcome. If you do not wish to join, then I ask you to remain silent about what I have written to you.

Kind regards,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

Horst von Hennings' reply:

Weimar, October 24, 1904

My dear and esteemed Dr.

If I am only thanking you today, more than two months later, for your kind letter, it is not out of negligence or indifference, but because I have been exceptionally overloaded with work lately and did not have the necessary time to answer your very serious letter. At the same time, this way I found enough time to examine myself and now I am all the more pleased to be able to repeat in writing what I could only hint at during your last visit due to the special circumstances, namely that I would be very happy if you would consider me as your student and prepare me as such for admission to the “inner circle”, provided you consider me capable and worthy of it. I am delighted by the trust you have placed in me, and I will endeavor to fulfill the duties that may be imposed on me through this “admittance” and thus consciously contribute to the well-being of my fellow human beings. I can assure you that it is not the desire for personal advantage (not even of a spiritual nature) but the inner conviction that the qualities inherent in me impose on me the duty to follow this path, if the hand is voluntarily offered to do so, and if I am serious about my decision to progress spiritually, as far as this is in my power.

I therefore make a heartfelt request to you: take my guidance into your hands and give me what you believe you are allowed to give me according to my circumstances and abilities; I will not lack goodwill, gratitude and patience on my part.

With faithful greetings

Always Gratefully Yours,

Horst von Henning

• 1. The card to which this reply is written is not available.

Eliza von Moltke wrote on 20 July 1904:

My dear Dr. Steiner!

Have you forgotten me completely! I know that one of the main things we humans must strive for is patience, and I would have waited patiently even longer if I had not so urgently needed some spiritual help. You kindly wanted to take care of me in this regard, to give me hints on how to work with myself to achieve the long-hoped-for goal of helping people... But now I would very much like to work on myself with success, as you see fit – and when you have received the instructions in this regard, which you first wanted to obtain on the higher plane, then be so kind as to share them with me. ...

In response to this letter, Rudolf Steiner replied:

Dear Madam,

Please do not assume that I will continue my practice of writing you as few letters as possible in the future. I will explain to you in person why this one is coming so late. In the future, I will write to you very regularly.

Please consider the enclosed document ¹ to be completely confidential. In such matters I am only an instrument of higher beings, whom I humbly revere. I deserve nothing; nothing depends on me. The only thing I can ascribe to myself is that I have undergone strict training that protects me from all fantasy. This was a requirement for me. Because what I experience in spiritual realms is thereby free from all imagination, from all deception, from all superstition. But even today I speak to few of this. People may think me a fantasist; I know the difference between truth and deception. And I know that I must go the way I go.

If you make the exercises outlined in the enclosed document yours, dear Madam, then you must not start before August 19 or after September 3. This is written, as the occultist says, in “the signs of heaven”. If you do not want to start between August 19 and September 3, it would be necessary for a later time to contact me again. Between August 19 and September 3, any day is possible.

I often think of the wonderful hours I was privileged to spend in your house [in Berlin]. I have also grown very fond of your husband and have high hopes for his spiritual future. Sometimes people take special paths; but many paths lead to knowledge.²

May you fare well in Silesia and have the inner peace you need.

With warm regards,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

• 1. not available.
• 2. Helmuth von Moltke was not a Theosophist, but later took a deep interest in Rudolf Steiner's spiritual science. See the memorial address for Moltke's death before the lecture Berlin, 20. Jun: 1916, in “Unsere Toten”, GA 261.

Michael Bauer had apparently written to Rudolf Steiner on July 28, 1904, based on a previous conversation:

Dear Doctor,

Without beating about the bush, I will say what I would like: I would like to be your student for a while and would be glad if you would give me a task that is necessary for me. With loving greetings,

Yours sincerely, Michael Bauer

Rudolf Steiner noted in the margin: “answered with rules 14. 8. 04”. His answer:

Dear Mr. Bauer!

In response to your kind words, I would like to say the following: Your relationship with the Theosophical movement is so intimate that you will find the best satisfaction in your esoteric life by joining the so-called “Esoteric School”. However, I ask you to consider the messages I am sending you about this as intended only for you and to treat them in the strictest confidence. Nobody is asked to join this occult school. But we may communicate its existence to those to whom we think it possible. And I want to give you such a communication. If you do not consider it appropriate for you to join, then you may disregard the communication and write to me to that effect. I will then immediately give you, without you being a member of the school, the necessary information for an esoteric course of development and will meet all your wishes.

First of all, you will find enclosed the rules of the so-called Shrâvaka Order, [see page 141]. One must first become a Shrâvaka (literally a listener) and follow the prescribed rules, then one is promoted to the higher degrees.

You will see that observing the “rules” is quite easy to begin with. However, strict adherence to them is necessary because only under this condition is real progress in spiritual life possible.

If you are ready to enter, please write to me. I will then send you a short “promise” by which you become a member and then, on September 22 or 23, for example, I will give you all the further information.

I would just like to write a few words about the nature of the school. You know that the “Theosophical Society” has a relationship to our exalted masters in that they gave the theosophical impulses to H.P.B. [H. P. Blavatsky], then leaving it to her to shape the movement on the physical plane. The Theosophical Society was founded by H.P.Blavatsky and Olcott in 1875 for this reason. Our occult school has nothing official to do with it. For it is precisely an “occult” school. It was founded directly by the Masters and is under the leadership of these Masters. And so the Theosophical Society constantly receives the truly living knowledge from this occult school. Little by little, the exercises prescribed by the school lead to knowledge of the masters. As long as she was on earth, H. P. Blavatsky was the head of the school. Now it is Annie Besant. Within Germany, Austria and German-speaking Switzerland, I have been entrusted with the leadership of the school.

As I said, this is not meant as pressure, but only as a message based on trust. If you join, you will have no obligation other than to follow the rules. If you cannot do it, please return the rules to me. I will then answer your letter in another form so that your wishes are also fulfilled outside the school. But within the school one does have the necessary support from the higher planes.

I will write to you immediately if you are a member in Germany and let me know of your interest. I will also send you all instructions for a proper meditation that imparts occult knowledge.

Annie Besant can possibly give a few lectures in Germany in September. However, since she can only stay in Germany for a few days, she will only be able to give a lecture in Munich for Bavaria. Believe me, dear Mr. Bauer, if it had been possible, I would have considered a lecture by Annie Besant in Nuremberg as well. However, due to Ms. Besant's limited time, it is absolutely not possible. She will speak in Weimar on September 18 and in Munich on September 20; and I hope that you and your wife will be able to attend the lecture at one of the locations.

Kind regards to your wife and family,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

Berlin, August 27, 1904

Dear, dear Miss Scholl!

I would like to respond to your letter very quickly for the time being. ¹ If Mr. Keightley comes to Germany, we can only approach the matter as dispassionately as possible. Those who know Mrs. Besant are aware of her attitude in such a case. She lets things happen and trusts in the spiritual forces that are with her. And I do no differently. Diplomatic thinking must be quite foreign to us, who follow the masters, not human reasoning. Therefore, we do not ask “why” in such a case. Mrs. Besant wrote only once to Miss v. Sivers that she “expects to meet Mr. Keightley” in Hamburg. That is all. And I am not asking for anything else. But, dear Miss Scholl: it is necessary that we, Mrs. Besant's entourage, stand together firmly and closely in the near future. What we will do will arise in each individual case. I also ask you not to stay away from Miss Link's presence at the moment out of any considerations for K. Link absent during K's presence, but to act as you would have done regardless of him, and to regard his presence as nothing particularly remarkable.²

Please regard these lines as a matter of trust. They must be brief if they are to meet with you tomorrow morning. In the arrangements for the date etc., nothing is decisive except what has been agreed between you and Miss Sivers.

More tomorrow. I have to navigate these lines to board the Cologne train.

With warm regards,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner

• 1. On August 26, Mathilde Scholl had written about how concerned she was to learn from England that Keightley would accompany Annie Besant on her trip to Germany and translate her lectures; this also appears in Rudolf Steiner's letter to Marie von Sivers of August 27, 1904 (in GA 262). There was evidently a certain mistrust of Keightley, presumably because at that time, in his capacity as General Secretary of the English (formerly European) Section, he supported an effort to split off an independent southern German section from the German Section (as can be seen from his letter to Rudolf Steiner dated March 7, 1904).
• 2. According to the letter from Mathilde Scholl dated August 26, Miss Link was friends with Keightley and registered as a guest with her.

Berlin, August 29, 1904

Dearest Fräulein Scholl!

Your relationship with Annie Besant is absolutely the right one. All Theosophists should feel the same way about her. But we must remain calm even if we experience that others do not feel the same way about her. Maya is powerful, and many a person gets into a difficult situation precisely because they move from a sure feeling to an uncertain judgment. It is much less important that we resist what is wrong than that we ourselves serve what is right. I know that in the long run nothing can happen if we do the right thing in Annie Besant's name; but temporarily, many things may occur that may make the situation appear difficult. Annie Besant is the Messenger of the Masters.¹ She does not necessarily have to engage in diplomatic moves, nor can a true occultist. Dear Miss Scholl, you can believe me when I say that wherever there is diplomatic interference, there is no connection with the masters. I know that it is in Annie Besant's interest if we behave quite naturally when Keightley comes, as if we accept his presence as something quite natural. And inwardly we must do that too. Your unease is also justified. But we must remain calm even in the face of such unease. There is so much in Germany that is outwardly against us; but let us not disturb our positive forces by being too considerate of such opposition.

It is a law of occultism that those who are accepted into the esoteric current may initially face strong resistance. It may be part of their testing to remain upright in the face of such opposition. Those who become occultists must soon absolve things that might otherwise have taken several lifetimes to encounter. If he follows his direct insight, he will also progress. He must only have all the courage for his insight. Such whole courage is a strong touchstone. He who, like you, is unshakably attached to a person like Annie Besant, has gained much. It is precisely through this relationship that you will make the most beautiful progress.

If there are people who do not stand by Annie Besant in this way, they will cause themselves the greatest harm. But many of those who err in this respect today will come to the right judgment again.

The occultist simply does not ask certain questions. For example, I do not even want to dwell on the fact that Keightley is coming to Germany. I heard from Miss v. Sivers that Annie Besant wrote the sentence: “I expect to meet Mr. Keightley in Hamburg”. And then Mrs. Lübke probably also wrote to Miss v. Sivers about it. Miss v. Sivers then also asked me how I felt about it. I told her: “not at all.”

If Annie Besant wants the translation of her lectures by Keightley, we will see. Personally, it would have seemed most appropriate to me if Frl. v. Sivers had translated everywhere.²

I am not yet able to send you the continuation of the last letter regarding “Light on the Path”. But I will certainly do so this week.³

Please give the Künstlers my warmest regards.

Yours,

Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

• 1. See on page 347 the transcript for Edouard Schur from 1907.
• 2. Rudolf Steiner then took over the German presentation.
• 3. This further exegesis evidently did not take place.

Berlin, August 29, 1904

Dear Mr. Wagner:

When Miss Scholl recently asked whether the two speeches by Annie Besant related to the Christian question should be translated, I was unable to advise. Please do not take this, dear Mr. Wagner, as if I were opposed to the translation. I would even be pleased to see another book by Annie Besant appear in German. But the occultist must strictly distinguish between direct advice and what I have just characterized. If I may express myself trivially, I would like to “abstain” from voting on this question. But in this case I would very much like my opinion to be completely disregarded.¹

Do not misunderstand me, dear Mr. Wagner. I would like you to hear me judge; but I also always want to clearly indicate when my judgment should not be taken into account at all. Only when we, who are united in the esoteric school, face each other in this way is the full freedom that occultism demands guaranteed.

Next, I will send you the rules of the German E.S. There I will also write to you in more detail about the movement in favor of the Gospel of John.²

For the time being, I ask you to continue as before with your position in the E.S. for the next few weeks.

Your sister Amalie is an E.S. member. Your other sister will probably be one in a few days.

In No. 15 of “Lucifer-Gnosis” I present a detailed discussion of the “four great religions”. ³ I hope that this book will go a long way. It is likely to win many hearts.

At the beginning of September, there will probably be an E.S. meeting here again. It will probably be about telling the E.S. members about the nature of the “Masters” and the help they give to the E.S. workers. On September 12th I shall then hold a T.S. meeting to prepare for Annie Besant's visit. And then we want to make our way through Germany with our Soul. I look forward to this with great satisfaction. On September 25th I shall then speak in Dresden on 'Theosophy and Modern Science'. — I know that this step will be much misunderstood. But I have no other option than to take it. It may be misunderstood, but it cannot have an unfavorable effect in the higher sense.⁴

I was very pleased that you, dear Mr. Wagner, were able to visit us in July. I hope you and your dear wife have arrived safely in Lugano. Please give her my warmest regards and receive

Most devotedly yours,

Rudolf Steiner
Berlin W, Motzstrasse 17

• 1. As can be seen from two letters from Günther Wagner to Rudolf Steiner dated September 1 and 2, 1904, there were plans to translate the English brochure “Is Theosophy anti-Christian?” by Annie Besant into German and distribute it among the clergy in Germany. Evidently Rudolf Steiner was not comfortable with this intention.
• 2. A letter about this is not available. In July 1904, in lectures given at the Berlin branch – which Günther Wagner had listened to – Rudolf Steiner had indicated that “a movement” would be born out of the bosom of the Theosophical Society, which would bring “a true understanding of Christianity, not in the ordinary sense” (July 11, 1904). And on July 18, 1904, there was talk of a “John Society,” a “John Gospel Department,” whose task would be to make known to the widest circles the inexhaustible depths of the Gospel of John. Whoever knows what can be found and learned there may “join this Gospel of John department with all their heart.”
• 3. Four lectures by Annie Besant, delivered at the 21st annual meeting of the Theosophical Society in Adyar, translated into German by Günther Wagner, published by Max Altmann, Leipzig 1904. Rudolf Steiner's discussion can be found in GA No. 34, “Lucifer-Gnosis”.
• 4. On September 25, 1904, Rudolf Steiner spoke on this topic at the Third General Theosophical Congress in Dresden. This was organized by the Hartmann people who were not affiliated with Adyar.

Berlin, September 14, 1904

Dear Mr. Wagner!

It is undoubtedly true that Annie Besant's lecture “Is Theosophy Antichristian” could not be understood in the same way in Germany as in England, because in the last few decades the discussion of fundamental Christian questions in England has taken on a completely different character in the circles of theologians and those of their spiritually dependent preachers etc. than in England.

From our spiritual leaders, we constantly receive instructions to individualize with regard to the individual countries. As for our Christian propaganda in particular, it should not fly the flag of “Theosophy”. It should emanate from Theosophists, but should never say so directly. Christian mysticism, interpretation of Christian symbols, etc. should be pursued. It will certainly be our task to win preachers, even Catholic priests, for esoteric Christianity. It will then be up to them to let the esoteric flow into their teachings. We ourselves would only be opposed if we wanted to approach Christian circles directly.

In Germany, a debate about whether Theosophy is anti-Christian or not would only create new opposition to Theosophy. There is a great aversion to everything called Theosophy, especially among pastors. And it is growing rapidly. When Bresch translates the things, there is nothing we can do. Because he always makes a very specific opposition. For example, he has now objected to Annie Besant coming to Leipzig. There is nothing we can do about that; we have to let Bresch have his way. But it is up to us to do the right thing.

You see, dear Mr. Wagner, on the one hand we are to decidedly emphasize 'Theosophy and on the other hand, where this is not appropriate, we are to place the matter higher than the name and the form. We are being told: “Be Theosophists; how you are Theosophists, that you must determine yourselves.”

In my last letter I said I would “abstain from voting”. The reason for this expression was as follows. I have instructions to cultivate the Christian element, and in this particular case I could only interpret what was meant to me as meaning that the lecture should not be translated. But now my own intellectual work begins, and there I found exactly the same reason that you give. Now that you have stated it yourself, I can also say that it applies to me as well. Before that I could only say, “I cannot be in favor of it.” I am sure you will understand me. Tomorrow I will receive Mrs. Besant in Hamburg. On Friday she will be in Berlin.

Sincerely,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner

Kind regards to your esteemed wife.

On October 13, 1904, Günther Wagner wrote to Rudolf Steiner:

Today I am coming to ask you whether you would like to accept my dear wife into the E.S. For a long time she has been unsure as to whether she is worthy enough, but the wish to use this favorable opportunity to advance on her path through life has always come back, and so she has asked me to ask you for advice on whether to encourage her or (on the quiet) dissuade her. Even if outwardly she does not feel so compelled to speak out for our striving, I know that she is serious about mastering herself. I would therefore like to see her personally drawn into the inner movement. She has been a member of the T.S. for 5 or 6 years. We look forward to your kind reply.

With my best regards,

Günther Wagner

Rudolf Steiner replied:

Dear Mr. Wagner!

For the time being, I would just like to write to you in the railway carriage to say that I will answer your question in the affirmative in the very near future with regard to your dear wife. I am on a lecture tour, have given a series of lectures in Nuremberg, Regensburg and Munich, and am now going to Stuttgart, Karlsruhe, Heidelberg, Cologne and Düsseldorf. Then to Leipzig, Hamburg. I will report to you on this and several other matters.

In Berlin, I am increasingly being relieved, and then - you will see - all correspondence will finally become regular.

In the meantime, warmest greetings to you and your dear wife.

Yours,

Dr. Rudolf Steiner